U.S. v. Pollack, No. 95-1141, No. 2068 (2nd Cir.) (91 F.3d 331) (July 31, 1996) (Judge Frank X. Altimari)
Loaded on Sept. 1, 1996
published in Punch and Jurists
September 09, 1996
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists.
Case held that in evaluating the good faith of the prosecution's dissatisfaction with the defendant's cooperation, such dissatisfaction may not be based on bad faith, invidiousness or dishonesty. (Id., at 335).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Weinberger, No. 95-5665 (4th Cir.) (91 F.3d 642) (August 2, 1996) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
- U.S. v. Upton, No. 95-50206 (5th Cir.) (91 F.3d 677) (July 29, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Greer, No. 96-1058 (7th Cir.) (91 F.3d 996) (August 1, 1996) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Upton, No. 95-50206 (5th Cir.) (91 F.3d 677) (July 29, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Sokolow, No. 95-1367 (3rd Cir.) (91 F.3d 396) (July 26, 1996) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Sokolow, No. 95-1367 (3rd Cir.) (91 F.3d 396) (July 26, 1996) (Judge Jane A. Restani)
- U.S. v. Branch, No. 94-50437 (5th Cir.) (91 F.3d 699) (August 2, 1996) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Meadows, No. 95-3629 (7th Cir.) (91 F.3d 851) (July 26, 1996) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
- U.S. v. Beltran-Ortiz, No. 95-5439 (4th Cir.) (91 F.3d 665) (August 7, 1996) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Barajas-Nunez, No. 95-1643 (6th Cir.) (91 F.3d 826) (August 6, 1996) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Pollack, No. 95-1141, No. 2068 (2nd Cir.) (91 F.3d 331) (July 31, 1996) (Judge Frank X. Altimari)
- U.S. v. Upton, No. 95-50206 (5th Cir.) (91 F.3d 677) (July 29, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Charry Cubillos, No. 95-50237 (9th Cir.) (91 F.3d 1342) (September 9, 1996) (Judge Jerome Farris)
- U.S. v. Barajas-Nunez, No. 95-1643 (6th Cir.) (91 F.3d 826) (August 6, 1996) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Upton, No. 95-50206 (5th Cir.) (91 F.3d 677) (July 29, 1996) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.