Skip navigation

U.S. v. St. John, No. 95-3665 (8th Cir.) (92 F.3d 761) (August 19, 1996) (Judge Theodore McMillian)

Case held that no ex post facto violation arose from the fact that revocation of sentence imposed upon defendant included both term of imprisonment and new term of supervised release.

The defendant in this case was convicted and sentenced under the law prior to the enactment of the Violent Crime ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login