Skip navigation

Stoia v. U.S., No. 95-2424 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 392) (March 24, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)

Here, although the Court agreed that counsel had an actual conflict of interest, without any hearing, it simply denied any relief to the defendant because he had failed to show that the conflict actually prejudiced his defense.

This is an interesting case that explores the meaning of an attorney's "actual ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login