U.S. v. Beltran, No. 96-1271 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 365) (March 21, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
Loaded on April 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
April 28, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Factual Disputes/Findings.
Case held that defendant does not have the right under either the Sentencing Guidelines or the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to subpoena witnesses to contradict evidence contained in presentence report or supplemental sentencing record.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Golino, No. 95 CR 70 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (956 F.Supp. 359) (February 24, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Hernandez, No. 95-1328 (1st Cir.) (109 F.3d 13) (March 17, 1997) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Breeding, No. 95-6231 (6th Cir.) (109 F.3d 308) (March 26, 1997) (Judge Patrick J. Duggan)
- U.S. v. Anderson, No. 96 CR 251 (N.D.Ill.) (955 F.Supp. 935) (January 30, 1997) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
- U.S. v. Latney, No. 95-3170 (D.C. Cir.) (108 F.3d 1446) (March 21, 1997) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
- U.S. v. Harrington, No. 96-3060 (D.C. Cir.) (108 F.3d 1460) (March 25, 1997) (Judge Patricia M. Wald)
- U.S. v. Ortland, No. 96-10175 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 539) (March 18, 1997) (Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-2586 (8th Cir.) (109 F.3d 459) (March 24, 1997) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Beltran, No. 96-1271 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 365) (March 21, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
- U.S. v. Rostoff, No. Civ. No. 96-10558 (WGY) (D.Mass.) (956 F.Supp. 38) (January 13, 1997) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-3092 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 335) (March 17, 1997) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- Davis v. Crabtree, No. 96-35516 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 566) (March 20, 1997) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Chiu, No. 96-50066 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 624) (March 25, 1997) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)
- U.S. v. Saldana, No. 96-1371 (1st Cir.) (109 F.3d 100) (March 31, 1997) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Saldana, No. 96-1371 (1st Cir.) (109 F.3d 100) (March 31, 1997) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- U.S. v. Cabrales, No. 96-3080WM (8th Cir.) (109 F.3d 471) (March 24, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- Stoia v. U.S., No. 95-2424 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 392) (March 24, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Rostoff, No. Civ. No. 96-10558 (WGY) (D.Mass.) (956 F.Supp. 38) (January 13, 1997) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Joseph, No. 96-1507 (1st Cir.) (109 F.3d 34) (March 20, 1997) (Judge Levin H. Campbell)
- Somers v. Thurman, No. 96-55534 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 614) (March 25, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez-Soberal, No. 95-2013 (1st Cir.) (109 F.3d 64) (March 26, 1997) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Beltran, No. 96-1271 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 365) (March 21, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
- U.S. v. Bruce, No. 96-1652 (7th Cir.) (109 F.3d 323) (March 11, 1997) (Judge Harlington Jr. Wood)
- U.S. v. Gort-DiNonato, No. 96-1601 (6th Cir.) (109 F.3d 318) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Cabrales, No. 96-3080WM (8th Cir.) (109 F.3d 471) (March 24, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 96-1043 (8th Cir.) (109 F.3d 502) (March 28, 1997) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)
- Jesionowski v. Beck, No. Civ. 94-10434-MLW (D.Mass.) (955 F.Supp. 149) (March 6, 1997) (Judge Magistrate)
- U.S. v. Fulmer, No. 96-1331 (1st Cir.) (108 F.3d 1486) (March 28, 1997) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 3:99-00339 (D.S.C.) (956 F.Supp. 622) (February 28, 1997) (Judge Falcon B. Hawkins)
- U.S. v. Taylor, No. 3:99-00339 (D.S.C.) (956 F.Supp. 622) (February 28, 1997) (Judge Falcon B. Hawkins)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, Feb. 1, 2025. Sanctions, Eyewitness Testimony, Brady Rule violations, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony, Factual Disputes/Findings, Legal or Factual Challenges - assertion of.
- Study: ‘Inconclusive Finding’ by Examiner of Cartridge Casing Should Be Finding of ‘Excluded’ 85% of the Time, Nov. 1, 2023. junk science, Evidence - Admissibility, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: ‘Actual Killer’ Under Felony-Murder Rule Means Person ‘Who Personally Killed the Victim”, Feb. 15, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- California Court of Appeal: At Felony-Murder Resentencing Hearing, Court May Not Deny Relief Based on Findings That Are Inconsistent With Previous Acquittal, Jan. 15, 2023. New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal, Resentencing, Factual Disputes/Findings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.