Skip navigation

U.S. v. Chiu, No. 96-50066 (9th Cir.) (109 F.3d 624) (March 25, 1997) (Judge Robert R. Beezer)

This case points out another of the many traps in proffer agreements. The defendant signed a proffer agreement that contained a provision that appeared to offer him limited immunity for state ments made during the proffer session. It said: "Except as herein otherwise provided . . . the government will ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login