Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rostoff, No. Civ. No. 96-10558 (WGY) (D.Mass.) (956 F.Supp. 38) (January 13, 1997) (Judge William G. Young)

Here, in affirming the Givernment's right to collect restitution after the end of supervised release, the Court held that the VWPA cannot have been intended to mean that restitution obligations terminate after some finite period of time.

United States v. Rostoff, 956 F.Supp. 38 (D.Mass 1997) (Judge Young)
United States ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login