Skip navigation

U.S. v. Zink, No. 95-50534 (9th Cir.) (107 F.3d 716) (February 19, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)

Case held that a general waiver of the right to appeal a sentence does not cover an action to appeal a restitution order, because restitution is not calculated using the Guidelines, but rather is determined by a separate statute, namely § 3663.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login