Skip navigation

Agard v. Portuondo, No. 96-2281, No. 336 (2nd Cir.) (117 F.3d 696) (July 3, 1997) (Judge James L. Oakes)

Among the many issues raised in this awful rape case was one intriguing question: whether the prosecutor had violated the defendant's constitutional rights by insinuating to the jury for the first time during her summation that the defendant's presence in the courtroom at trial had provided him with a unique ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login