Skip navigation

Blaik v. U.S., No. 94-8323 (11th Cir.) (117 F.3d 1288) (July 24, 1997) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)

This is an important restitution case under the "old law", which held, inter alia, that a challenge to illegal restitution payments was permissible under 28 USC § 2255 - although the decsion was ultimately reversed at 161 F3d 1341.

This is an important restitution case under the “old law” in …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login