Skip navigation

Blaik v. U.S., No. 94-8323 (11th Cir.) (117 F.3d 1288) (July 24, 1997) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)

This is an important restitution case under the "old law", which held, inter alia, that a challenge to illegal restitution payments was permissible under 28 USC § 2255 - although the decsion was ultimately reversed at 161 F3d 1341.

This is an important restitution case under the “old law” in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login