Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bridges, No. 96-30963 (5th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1110) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

Although many cases show that when the Government wants to have a previously imposed sentence increased the courts will jump through hoops to stretch the law, this case shows that when a defendant wants to have a sentence decreased, the courts rigidly follow the letter of the law and revert ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login