Skip navigation

U.S. v. Clay, No. 96-5017 (6th Cir.) (117 F.3d 317) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Allen E. Norris)

Case held that when a defendant attempts to excuse his conduct he is not entitled to an acceptance of responsibility sentence reduction even if the excuses are not a legal justification sufficient to negate criminal responsibility.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login