U.S. v. O'Neil, No. 96-1623, No. 1531 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 65) (June 18, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
August 25, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Conflict of Interest.
In rendering its decision, the Court observed that although a "defendant's failure to pay fees may cause some divisiveness between attorney and client", courts generally presume that counsel will subordinate his or her pecuniary interests and honor his or her professional responsibility to a client. (Id., at 71).
Case held …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Garza, No. 95-21094 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 278) (July 16, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Arce, No. 96-20983 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 335) (July 18, 1997) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 96-4235 (4th Cir.) (118 F.3d 228) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- U.S. v. Zyskind, No. 96-1770 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 113) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Mena, No. 96-CR-1043-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (968 F.Supp. 115) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Weekly, No. 96-1513 (8th Cir.) (118 F.3d 576) (May 23, 1997) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- Freund v. Butterworth, No. 93-5317 (11th Cir.) (117 F.3d 1543) (July 16, 1997) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Ritter, No. 97-1182 (6th Cir.) (118 F.3d 502) (July 22, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Rios-Favela, No. 96-50128 (9th Cir.) (118 F.3d 653) (June 25, 1997) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- U.S. v. Mena, No. 96-CR-1043-01 (E.D.N.Y.) (968 F.Supp. 115) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Becraft, No. 96-3098 (D.C. Cir.) (117 F.3d 1450) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. Ritter, No. 97-1182 (6th Cir.) (118 F.3d 502) (July 22, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Polk, No. 96-40836 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 286) (July 17, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Bryant, No. 95-3148 (D.C. Cir.) (117 F.3d 1464) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- McBride v. Johnson, No. 96-10270 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 432) (August 1, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Bryant, No. 95-3148 (D.C. Cir.) (117 F.3d 1464) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. Pankhurst, No. 96-20563 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 345) (July 18, 1997) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
- U.S. v. O'Neil, No. 96-1623, No. 1531 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 65) (June 18, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- U.S. v. Griffith, No. 96-30655 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 318) (July 17, 1997) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- Marts v. Hines, No. 94-30513 (5th Cir.) (117 F.3d 1504) (July 18, 1997) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Rosario, No. 96-5286 (3rd Cir.) (118 F.3d 160) (July 10, 1997) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
- U.S. v. O'Neil, No. 96-1623, No. 1531 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 65) (June 18, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- U.S. v. Rogers, No. 95-5351 (6th Cir.) (118 F.3d 466) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Walker, No. 97-1647 (7th Cir.) (118 F.3d 559) (July 17, 1997) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Rogers, No. 95-5351 (6th Cir.) (118 F.3d 466) (July 2, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Richards, No. 96-3796 (8th Cir.) (118 F.3d 622) (July 21, 1997) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Bryant, No. 95-3148 (D.C. Cir.) (117 F.3d 1464) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
- U.S. v. Sanchez, No. 96-4215 (4th Cir.) (118 F.3d 192) (June 30, 1997) (Judge James Dickson Jr. Phillips)
- U.S. v. Griffith, No. 96-30655 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 318) (July 17, 1997) (Judge Fortunato P. Benavides)
- U.S. v. Pankhurst, No. 96-20563 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 345) (July 18, 1997) (Judge Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale)
- U.S. v. O'Neil, No. 96-1623, No. 1531 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 65) (June 18, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- McBride v. Johnson, No. 96-10270 (5th Cir.) (118 F.3d 432) (August 1, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
More from these topics:
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Defense Counsel Had Actual Conflict of Interest Where Own Performance During Police Interview of Defendant Could Serve as Basis of Motion to Suppress Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, New Trial Required W, March 15, 2025. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Motions To Suppress, Conflict of Interest.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, Dec. 15, 2023. Counsel - Constructive denial of, Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel.
- Texas Prosecutor Spent 20-Year Career Also Working as Law Clerk to Judges He Appeared Before, May 5, 2022. Attorney Misconduct, Conflict of Interest.
- Arizona Supreme Court: Trial Court’s Failure to Protect Defendant’s Right to Conflict-Free Counsel May Be Raised on Direct Appeal 16 Massachusetts Supreme Court: Error to Exclude Expert Testimony on Significance of Tattoo to Support Claim of Self-Defense, Aug. 15, 2021. Appealable Issues/Orders, Conflict of Interest.
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, June 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, Conflict of Interest.
- "Kentucky Supreme Court: Hearing on Defense Counsel’s Fitness Is Critical Stage at Which Defendant Has Right to Be Present With Conflict-Free Counsel", March 15, 2021. Strickland Standard, Conflict of Interest.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.