Skip navigation

U.S. v. O'Neil, No. 96-1623, No. 1531 (2nd Cir.) (118 F.3d 65) (June 18, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)

In rendering its decision, the Court observed that although a "defendant's failure to pay fees may cause some divisiveness between attorney and client", courts generally presume that counsel will subordinate his or her pecuniary interests and honor his or her professional responsibility to a client. (Id., at 71).

Case held ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login