U.S. v. Rutgard, No. 95-50309 (9th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1270) (June 4, 1997) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
August 04, 1997
Filed under:
Retroactivity,
Punch And Jurists.
Case held that 1990 amendments to Victim and Witness Protection Act, which authorized restitution for conduct beyond the counts of conviction, were substantive changes to the law and could not be applied retroactively.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Yoakam, No. 96-3207 (10th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1346) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 2:93CR162 (E.D.Va.) (966 F.Supp. 408) (June 5, 1997) (Judge Robert G. Doumar)
- Rodriguez v. U.S., No. 96-2763 (2nd Cir.) (116 F.3d 1002) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Wilfred Feinberg)
- U.S. v. Matt, No. 96-1614 (2nd Cir.) (116 F.3d 971) (June 4, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Webb, No. 94-0245 (D.D.C.) (966 F.Supp. 16) (May 30, 1997) (Judge Stanley Sporkin)
- U.S. v. Gordils, No. 96-1691 (2nd Cir.) (117 F.3d 99) (July 8, 1997) (Judge Wilfred Feinberg)
- U.S. v. Bridges, No. 96-30963 (5th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1110) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-2076 (1st Cir.) (116 F.3d 948) (June 24, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Bridges, No. 96-30963 (5th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1110) (June 27, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)
- U.S. v. Carroll, No. WMN-96-0398 (D.Md.) (966 F.Supp. 392) (June 6, 1997) (Judge Herbert N. Maletz)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 95-30998 (5th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1066) (June 26, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- U.S. v. Rutgard, No. 95-50309 (9th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1270) (June 4, 1997) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. White, No. 96-2076 (1st Cir.) (116 F.3d 948) (June 24, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Castleberry, No. 96-8596 (11th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1384) (June 23, 1997) (Judge Peter T. Fay)
- U.S. v. Rutgard, No. 95-50309 (9th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1270) (June 4, 1997) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
- U.S. v. White, No. 94-3063 (D.C. Cir.) (116 F.3d 903) (June 27, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Webb, No. 94-0245 (D.D.C.) (966 F.Supp. 16) (May 30, 1997) (Judge Stanley Sporkin)
- U.S. v. Cabrera, No. 96-3972 (8th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1243) (July 7, 1997) (Judge John R. Gibson)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-4095 (8th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1225) (June 25, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez, No. 96-4095 (8th Cir.) (116 F.3d 1225) (June 25, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Strikes Retroactive Application of Parts of Tennessee’s Sweeping Sex Offender Registration, Verification, and Tracking Law, Oct. 1, 2024. Sex Offender Registration, Retroactivity.
- Refuting the Government’s Argument Against Nonretroactive Changes in Law as Grounds for Compassionate Release, Oct. 1, 2024. Retroactivity, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity, Compassionate Release.
- New Mexico Supreme Court Announces Marquez’s Holding That ‘Crime of Shooting at or From Motor Vehicle Cannot Be Predicate Felony Supporting Charge of Felony Murder’ Is New Substantive Rule and Applies Retroactively, Feb. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, Murder/Felony Murder.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Have Discretion to Consider Non-Retroactive Changes in Post-Sentencing Decisional Law in Assessing ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons’ for Sentence Reduction, Oct. 1, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Erred by Concluding Senate Bill 1393 Does Not Apply to Cases Already Final on Appeal, April 15, 2023. Retroactivity.
- Sixth Circuit Announces Nonretroactive Change in Sentencing Law Is Not an ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ Warranting a Sentence Reduction under Compassionate Release Statute, Feb. 15, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Compassionate Release.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- California Court of Appeal: Assembly Bill 124 Applies Retroactively and Includes Psychological Trauma Based Upon Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor Under § 1170(b)(6), Aug. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Mental Health, Reliance on Psychologist's Report.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces 2011 SORA May Not Be Retroactively Applied to Registrants Whose Offenses Predated Its Enactment Because Doing So Violates Prohibition on Ex Post Facto Laws, Feb. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.
- California Supreme Court Announces Suspended Execution of Sentence with Probation Imposed Is Not ‘Final’ so New Changes in Law Apply Retroactively on Appeal, Nov. 15, 2021. Retroactivity, Resentencing.