Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
December 01, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Cruz, No. 96-10159 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 791) (September 19, 1997) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-3024 (D.C. Cir.) (127 F.3d 68) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 890) (October 22, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Wong, No. 97-1441WM (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 725) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Otis, No. 93-50649 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 829) (October 7, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Tenzer, No. 96-1653 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 222) (September 19, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 96-8110 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 947) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 96-1673 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 277) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Cropp, No. 95-5908 (4th Cir.) (127 F.3d 354) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin)
- Bilzerian v. U.S., No. 96-2920 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 237) (September 30, 1997) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 890) (October 22, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Berndt, No. 97-1319, No. 669 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 251) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Cropp, No. 95-5908 (4th Cir.) (127 F.3d 354) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin)
- U.S. v. Cruz, No. 96-10159 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 791) (September 19, 1997) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez-Velarde, No. 96-2292 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 966) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Wong, No. 97-1441WM (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 725) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 96-1673 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 277) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Banta, No. 96-4030 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 982) (October 20, 1997) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Hankins, No. 96-5207 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 932) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Meza, No. 95-2184 (7th Cir.) (127 F.3d 545) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Hankins, No. 96-5207 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 932) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
- U.S. v. Meza, No. 95-2184 (7th Cir.) (127 F.3d 545) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 96-8110 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 947) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Sobrilski, No. 96-3970 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 669) (October 9, 1997) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-8120 (11th Cir.) (127 F.3d 987) (October 31, 1997) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-3024 (D.C. Cir.) (127 F.3d 68) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- U.S. v. Sobrilski, No. 96-3970 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 669) (October 9, 1997) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Sets Up Circuit Split with Ruling on Michigan Prisoner’s PLRA Exhaustion Dispute, Oct. 15, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Second Circuit: New York Prisoner’s Prior Cases Not PLRA Strikes, Sept. 15, 2024. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Fifth Circuit: Texas Prisoner’s Declaration Alone Sufficient to Send PLRA Exhaustion Dispute to Trial, July 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Summary Judgment/Judgment N.O.V., Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- $20,000 Paid to Florida Prisoner After Eleventh Circuit Finds PLRA Inapplicable to Claims DOC Removed to Federal Court, Dec. 1, 2023. Settlements, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner’s Dismissed Complaint Doesn’t Count as a “Strike”, Dec. 1, 2023. Complaints, Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Fourth Circuit: Dismissal of South Carolina Prisoner’s Complaint Cannot Prematurely Be Called a “Strike” Under PLRA, Nov. 15, 2023. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner Who Dismissed Complaint Cannot Be Assessed a “Strike” Under PLRA, Nov. 15, 2023. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Fourth Circuit Says Three-Strikes Federal Prisoner’s Imminent Danger Claim Must Be Evaluated on ‘Totality of Circumstances’, Feb. 1, 2023. Combination of Factors/Totality of Circumstances, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Imminent Danger Exception.