Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
December 01, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
In September, 1996, Judge Longstaff issued an important decision, in Lyon v. Vande Krol, 940 F.Supp. 1433 (S.D.Iowa 1996), in which he ruled that part of the in forma pauperis statute contained in the recently enacted Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), namely 28 U.S.S. § 1915, was unconstitutional under the …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-8120 (11th Cir.) (127 F.3d 987) (October 31, 1997) (Judge Joel F. Dubina)
- U.S. v. Sobrilski, No. 96-3970 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 669) (October 9, 1997) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-3024 (D.C. Cir.) (127 F.3d 68) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- U.S. v. Sobrilski, No. 96-3970 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 669) (October 9, 1997) (Judge Daniel M. Friedman)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 96-8110 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 947) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Meza, No. 95-2184 (7th Cir.) (127 F.3d 545) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
- U.S. v. Hankins, No. 96-5207 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 932) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Meza, No. 95-2184 (7th Cir.) (127 F.3d 545) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Hankins, No. 96-5207 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 932) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Banta, No. 96-4030 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 982) (October 20, 1997) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 96-1673 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 277) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)
- U.S. v. Wong, No. 97-1441WM (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 725) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Rodriguez-Velarde, No. 96-2292 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 966) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Michael R. Murphy)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Cruz, No. 96-10159 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 791) (September 19, 1997) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Cropp, No. 95-5908 (4th Cir.) (127 F.3d 354) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin)
- U.S. v. Berndt, No. 97-1319, No. 669 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 251) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 890) (October 22, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- Bilzerian v. U.S., No. 96-2920 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 237) (September 30, 1997) (Judge Joseph M. McLaughlin)
- U.S. v. Cropp, No. 95-5908 (4th Cir.) (127 F.3d 354) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Sam J. III Ervin)
- U.S. v. Fernandez, No. 96-1673 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 277) (October 10, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 96-8110 (10th Cir.) (127 F.3d 947) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Wade Brorby)
- U.S. v. Tenzer, No. 96-1653 (2nd Cir.) (127 F.3d 222) (September 19, 1997) (Judge Roger J. Miner)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Otis, No. 93-50649 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 829) (October 7, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- Lyon v. Krol, No. 96-3752 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 763) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Wong, No. 97-1441WM (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 725) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Richard S. Arnold)
- U.S. v. Barron, No. 96-36058 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 890) (October 22, 1997) (Judge David R. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 96-3024 (D.C. Cir.) (127 F.3d 68) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Merrick B. Garland)
- U.S. v. Stein, No. 96-30150 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 777) (October 7, 1997) (Judge Alfred T. Goodwin)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 96-5196 (6th Cir.) (127 F.3d 510) (October 8, 1997) (Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich)
- U.S. v. Cruz, No. 96-10159 (9th Cir.) (127 F.3d 791) (September 19, 1997) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
More from these topics:
- Ninth Circuit: Continuing-Violations Doctrine Applies for PLRA Administrative Exhaustion Purposes, Aug. 1, 2025. Failure to Protect (General), Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Pittsburgh Lockup Accounts for 43% of Pennsylvania Jail TASER Use, Suit Filed, May 1, 2025. Guard Brutality/Beatings, Stun Guns/Tasers, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Sixth Circuit: Dismissals of Mixed-Claim Complaints Not Strikes Under PLRA, April 1, 2025. Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Sixth Circuit Sets Up Circuit Split with Ruling on Michigan Prisoner’s PLRA Exhaustion Dispute, Oct. 15, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Second Circuit: New York Prisoner’s Prior Cases Not PLRA Strikes, Sept. 15, 2024. Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Fifth Circuit: Texas Prisoner’s Declaration Alone Sufficient to Send PLRA Exhaustion Dispute to Trial, July 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Summary Judgment, Summary Judgment/Judgment N.O.V., Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- “Third Time Is Not the Charm” For Texas Jailers Barred by PLRA from Enforcing Prior Settlement Agreement Against Prisoner in New Suit, May 1, 2024. Jail Specific, PLRA, Settlements, Attorney Calls, Civil Settlement - Effect of, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Wiretaps/Wiretap Evidence.
- Finding Indiana Grievance Process “Unavailable,” Federal Judge Grants Summary Judgment to 22 Prisoners on Same Day, April 1, 2024. PLRA, Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- $20,000 Paid to Florida Prisoner After Eleventh Circuit Finds PLRA Inapplicable to Claims DOC Removed to Federal Court, Dec. 1, 2023. Settlements, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner’s Dismissed Complaint Doesn’t Count as a “Strike”, Dec. 1, 2023. Complaints, Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.