Skip navigation

U.S. v. Earnest, No. 97-1222 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 906) (November 14, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)

Even though defendant earlier admitted that the drug for which he was convicted was crack, because he was denied an evidentiary hearing to determine whether it was crack for sentencing purposes, the case was remanded.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login