Skip navigation

U.S. v. Emerson, No. 96-3166 (7th Cir.) (128 F.3d 557) (October 20, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)

Court held that the defendant should get no credit or offset against his forfeiture order for the value of property previously forfeited.

Relying heavily on U.S. v. Various Computers and Computer Equipment, 82 F.3d 582 (3rd Cir. 1996), the Court denied the defendant's claim that the prior forfeiture violated the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login