Skip navigation

U.S. v. Harris, No. 96-4539 (4th Cir.) (128 F.3d 850) (October 29, 1997) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)

Use of gun enhancement under U.S.S.G. Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) does not require proof of precisely concurrent acts.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login