Skip navigation

U.S. v. Higgins, No. 97-5006 (3rd Cir.) (128 F.3d 138) (October 17, 1997) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

In U.S. v. Nottingham, 898 F.2d 390 (3rd Cir. 1990), the Third Circuit held that a previous version of Section 5G1.3(c) was invalid because that section, which mandated consecutive sentences, conflicted with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3584(a), which provides generally that a district court has discretion to order ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login