U.S. v. Hunt, No. 96-50639 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 739) (November 17, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
December 29, 1997
Court vacated a drug conviction for distribution on the grounds that the Government failed to prove anything but simple possession.
This is an interesting drug case in which the Fifth Circuit first vacated a drug conviction for possession with intent to distribute because the Government had failed to prove anything ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Word, No. 95-8288 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1209) (November 21, 1997) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Word, No. 95-8288 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1209) (November 21, 1997) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Lopez-Iraeta, No. 96-35151 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1206) (November 21, 1997) (Judge Joseph Woodrow Hatchett)
- U.S. v. Winchell, No. 96-1513 (10th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1093) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- U.S. v. Hudson, No. 97-2182 (8th Cir.) (129 F.3d 994) (November 5, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Miniken v. Walter, No. CS-96-407-JLQ (E.D.Wash.) (978 F.Supp. 1356) (August 26, 1997) (Judge Justin L. Quackenbush)
- U.S. v. Barnette, No. 95-3591 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1179) (November 20, 1997) (Judge James Larry Edmondson)
- U.S. v. Stockdale, No. 96-30199 (9th Cir.) (126 F.3d 1066) (November 20, 1997) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Hoffer, No. 96-4354 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1196) (November 21, 1997) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Moore, No. 97-1351 (8th Cir.) (129 F.3d 989) (December 16, 1997) (Judge Donald R. Ross)
- U.S. v. Hunt, No. 96-50639 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 739) (November 17, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- U.S. v. Winchell, No. 96-1513 (10th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1093) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- Plyler v. Moore, No. 96-7689 (4th Cir.) (129 F.3d 728) (October 16, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
- U.S. v. Hunt, No. 96-50639 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 739) (November 17, 1997) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
- U.S. v. Torres-Echevarria, No. 97-1116 (2nd Cir.) (129 F.3d 692) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- Inmates of Suffolk County v. Rouse, No. 97-1261 (1st Cir.) (129 F.3d 649) (November 7, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. S.A., No. 97-1155 (8th Cir.) (129 F.3d 995) (November 17, 1997) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Earnest, No. 97-1222 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 906) (November 14, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
- U.S. v. Bartelho, No. 96-1273 (1st Cir.) (129 F.3d 663) (November 25, 1997) (Judge Steven J. McAuliffe)
- U.S. v. Bartelho, No. 96-1273 (1st Cir.) (129 F.3d 663) (November 25, 1997) (Judge Steven J. McAuliffe)
- U.S. v. Bauer, No. 97-1779 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 962) (November 20, 1997) (Judge Michael S. Kanne)
- U.S. v. Castro, No. 96-40687 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 752) (November 19, 1997) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Mansolo, No. 96-50882 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 749) (November 18, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Senn, No. 96-3373 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 886) (November 6, 1997) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
- U.S. v. Mansolo, No. 96-50882 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 749) (November 18, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Winchell, No. 96-1513 (10th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1093) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- U.S. v. Jones, No. 96-1438L, No. 41 (2nd Cir.) (129 F.3d 718) (November 19, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Castro, No. 96-40687 (5th Cir.) (129 F.3d 752) (November 19, 1997) (Judge Henry A. Politz)
- U.S. v. Gallegos, No. 96-2240 (10th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1140) (November 14, 1997) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- U.S. v. Lopez-Iraeta, No. 96-35151 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1206) (November 21, 1997) (Judge Joseph Woodrow Hatchett)
- U.S. v. Hoffer, No. 96-4354 (11th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1196) (November 21, 1997) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- U.S. v. Dawn, No. 96-3585 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 878) (November 4, 1997) (Judge Ilana Diamond Rovner)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 97-1772 (7th Cir.) (129 F.3d 949) (November 19, 1997) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Drug Buy Between Dealer and User Doesn’t Constitute Conspiracy to Distribute, Aug. 15, 2021. Conspiracy, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Washington Supreme Court Announces State’s Strict-Liability Drug Possession Law Is Unconstitutional, May 15, 2021. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Denial of Due Process.
- Fifth Circuit: Evidence of Simple Drug Possession Insufficient to Search Cellphone Photos for Evidence of Drug Trafficking, March 15, 2021. Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Tenth Circuit: Confession Involuntary Where FBI Agent Falsely Claimed to Be in Contact With Judge, and Defendant Could Shorten Sentence With Each Truthful Answer, Aug. 15, 2020. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Interrogation, Cooperation.
- Using Doctor-Prescribed Marijuana Could Send Some People Back to Prison, July 15, 2020. Revocation Proceedings, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Complexity and Lack of Standardization Makes Crime Statistics Less Useful, April 15, 2020. Statistics/Trends, Marijuana Laws/Issues, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.