Skip navigation

U.S. v. Ravitch, No. 96-21002 (5th Cir.) (128 F.3d 865) (November 7, 1997) (Per Curiam)

The Court wrote "Where we have concluded that 'if the case were remanded the trial judge could reinstate the same sentence', we have upheld the defendant's sentence although the district court's stated reasons for departing evidence a mistaken application of the Sentencing Guidelines." (Id., at 869).

[Editor's Note: But see ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login