Skip navigation

U.S. v. Salemme, No. 94-10287 (D.Mass.) (978 F.Supp. 343) (May 22, 1997) (Judge Mark L. Wolf)

Here the Court stated that: "In contrast to the requirements concerning probable cause and prior applications [for a wiretap order]. . . ., the government's statutory obligation to make 'a full and complete statement concerning the necessity of the powerful and intrusive weapon that electronic surveillance constitutes is unqualified; the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login