Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wells, No. 93-3924 (8th Cir.) (127 F.3d 739) (October 14, 1997) (Judge Michael J. Melloy)

The Court noted that "more than minimal planning 'is deemed present in any case involving repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune'." (Id., at 749).

Court reversed the district court's decision not to apply a more than minimal planning enhancement ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login