Skip navigation

U.S. v. Winchell, No. 96-1513 (10th Cir.) (129 F.3d 1093) (November 3, 1997) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)

As this tax protestor case shows, the established rule that the Government must prove specific intent as well as willfulness and materiality sometimes does not apply in cases dealing with the filing of false tax returns.

As this case shows, it just doesn't pay to mess around with Mother Nature ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login