Skip navigation

Joiner v. U.S., No. 95-9344 (11th Cir.) (103 F.3d 961) (January 22, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Here the Eleventh Circuit held that the defendant would not have been barred as a matter of law from receiving an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility merely because he asserted an entrapment defense at trial.

The Court stated: "Reviewing the merits of the wrongful denial of adjustment for acceptance of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login