Skip navigation

U.S. v. Hicks, No. 95-30342 (9th Cir.) (103 F.3d 837) (December 24, 1996) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)

This case is noted because of the Court's ruling that a district court may not order the parties to exchange witness lists and summaries of anticipated witness testimony in advance of trial. In its analysis of this issue, the Court carefully reviewed the history of Rule 16 of the Fed.R.Crim.P., ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login