Skip navigation

U.S. v. McMinn, No. 96-1592 (1st Cir.) (103 F.3d 216) (January 13, 1997) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)

This decision considered the so-called "in the business of receiving and selling stolen property" ("ITB") enhancement contained in § 2B1.1(b)(4)(B). The defendant argued that it was error for the district court to have imposed that four-level enhancement on him because, although he stole property, he was not in the fencing …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login