Skip navigation

U.S. v. McMinn, No. 96-1592 (1st Cir.) (103 F.3d 216) (January 13, 1997) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)

This decision considered the so-called "in the business of receiving and selling stolen property" ("ITB") enhancement contained in ยง 2B1.1(b)(4)(B). The defendant argued that it was error for the district court to have imposed that four-level enhancement on him because, although he stole property, he was not in the fencing ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login