Skip navigation

U.S. v. Payseno, No. 96-2390 (8th Cir.) (104 F.3d 191) (January 8, 1997) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)

Here the Court affirmed the imposition of a fencing enhancement under ยง 2B1.1(b)(4)(B) because the Court found that the defendant received and sold stolen goods for profit over an extended period of time as admitted that in her presentence report.

Citing U.S. v. Warshawsky, 20 F.3d 204, 214 (6th Cir. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login