Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cook, No. 96-1814 (7th Cir.) (102 F.3d 249) (December 5, 1996) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)

Court approved use of special instructions to warn jury that paid informant's testimony may be particularly suspect.

In this case, both the majority decision and Judge Ripple's concurring decision discuss at length some of the philosophical reasons for and against giving special jury instructions which single out paid informant's testimony ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login