U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
January 06, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Right to be Present.
Here the Court held that the defendant did not have the right to be present when he was resentenced on remand.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Artim, No. 96-202 (D.N.J.) (944 F.Supp. 363) (November 1, 1996) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 94-CR-105-B (D.Wyo.) (944 F.Supp. 864) (October 17, 1996) (Judge Clarence A. Brimmer)
- Love v. Morton, No. 95-6309 (JEI) (D.N.J.) (944 F.Supp. 379) (November 12, 1996) (Judge Joseph E. Irenas)
- U.S. v. Blackwell, No. 94-CR-105-B (D.Wyo.) (944 F.Supp. 864) (October 17, 1996) (Judge Clarence A. Brimmer)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Artim, No. 96-202 (D.N.J.) (944 F.Supp. 363) (November 1, 1996) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- Reyes v. U.S., No. 96 Civ. 2096 (CSH) (S.D.N.Y.) (944 F.Supp. 260) (October 23, 1996) (Judge Charles S. Jr. Haight)
- U.S. v. Bailey, No. 94-2314 (11th Cir.) (123 F.3d 1381) (September 24, 1997) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
- Reyes v. U.S., No. 96 Civ. 2096 (CSH) (S.D.N.Y.) (944 F.Supp. 260) (October 23, 1996) (Judge Charles S. Jr. Haight)
- U.S. v. Fagge, No. 96-1287, No. 498 (2nd Cir.) (101 F.3d 232) (November 25, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Chukwura, No. 96-1130, No. 433 (2nd Cir.) (101 F.3d 230) (November 26, 1996) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Fagge, No. 96-1287, No. 498 (2nd Cir.) (101 F.3d 232) (November 25, 1996) (Judge Ralph K. Jr. Winter)
- U.S. v. Artim, No. 96-202 (D.N.J.) (944 F.Supp. 363) (November 1, 1996) (Judge Stephen M. Orlofsky)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Ahmad, No. 95-20627 (5th Cir.) (101 F.3d 386) (November 27, 1996) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Pearl, No. 96-46-P-C (D.Me.) (944 F.Supp. 51) (November 6, 1996) (Judge Gene Carter)
- U.S. v. Parker, No. 95-3899 (7th Cir.) (101 F.3d 527) (December 2, 1996) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Beltran, No. 96-3085 (8th Cir.) (122 F.3d 1156) (September 11, 1997) (Judge David R. Hansen)
- U.S. v. Perez, No. 94-60788 (5th Cir.) (110 F.3d 265) (April 8, 1997) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- U.S. v. Pettiford, No. 96-1045 (1st Cir.) (101 F.3d 199) (November 25, 1996) (Judge Bailey Aldrich)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 95-1754 (1st Cir.) (101 F.3d 202) (November 26, 1996) (Judge Levin H. Campbell)
- U.S. v. Peterson, No. 95-40820 (5th Cir.) (101 F.3d 375) (November 27, 1996) (Judge Eldon E. Fallon)
- U.S. v. Cruz-Rojas, No. 95-1711 (2nd Cir.) (101 F.3d 283) (November 29, 1996) (Judge Louis H. Pollak)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Evidentiary Hearing Under Felony Murder Resentencing Law, May 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- California Court of Appeal: Petitioner Has Constitutional Right to Be Present at Hearing to Determine Facts Surrounding Felony Murder Charges for Possible Resentencing Under § 1172.6, March 15, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Right to be Present.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.