Skip navigation

U.S. v. Strange, No. 96-1244 (8th Cir.) (102 F.3d 356) (December 13, 1996) (Judge Floyd R. Gibson)

Here the Court held that reasonable foreseeability "is completely immaterial" to the analysis of relevant conduct and therefore when a defendant personally participates in a drug transaction, the foreseeability of the drug quantity is irrelevant.

The importance of this case is that it emphasizes a major difference between the provisions ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login