Skip navigation

In Re Vial, No. 96-614 (4th Cir.) (115 F.3d 1192) (June 16, 1997) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)

Case held that Supreme Court's decision in Bailey did not announce a new rule of constitutional law and thus may not form the basis for a second or successive petition under 28 USC § 2255.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login