Skip navigation

U.S. v. Armstead, No. 96-40539 (5th Cir.) (114 F.3d 504) (June 2, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)

Here the Court conceded that there was no evidence that the defendants used or possessed any firearms before they broke into a pawn shop, but once they picked up guns during their burglary the Court ruled that subsequent possession satisfied the nexus requirement for possession because the firearms were then ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login