Skip navigation

U.S. v. Booker, No. 96-2994 (7th Cir.) (115 F.3d 442) (May 23, 1997) (Per Curiam)

This decision is noted for Judge Evans's dissent in which he forcefully argued that, despite the goal of the Guidelines to eliminate sentencing disparities, we could not have more diaparities than we have today.

Have the Sentencing Guidelines achieved uniformity in sentencing as promised? This case presents a revealing look ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login