Skip navigation

U.S. v. Martin, No. 96-7373 (3rd Cir.) (116 F.3d 702) (June 18, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Case is noted for Judge Sloviter's dissent in which he argues that in a § 2255 petition, the court has no authority to modify the original sentence after an appeal limited to the issues raised in Bailey v. U.S.

United States v. Morris, 116 F.3d 501 (D.C.Cir. 1997) (Judge Williams) ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login