Skip navigation

U.S. v. Van Brocklin, No. 96-2326 (8th Cir.) (115 F.3d 587) (June 6, 1997) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)

Court held that forfeiture order which required defendant, who reaped no benefit from crime, to pay same restitution as a co-defendant who reaped substantial benefits violated the Excess Fines Clause.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login