Skip navigation

Mitchell v. Farcass, No. 96-3026 (11th Cir.) (112 F.3d 1483) (May 6, 1997) (Judge Joseph Woodrow Hatchett)

Here, Judge Lay, in a concurring opinion, concluded that the PLRA, by means of § 1915(e)(2), now requires
the sua sponte dismissal of complaints filed by IFP litigants when the litigant fails to state a claim. He stated that the new § 1915(e)(2) does not allow for an opportunity to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login