U.S. v. Fields, No. 96-1168, No. 431 (2nd Cir.) (113 F.3d 313) (May 12, 1997) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
Loaded on June 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
June 23, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Ability to Pay.
Court affirmed imposition of $25,000 fine even though evidence "suggested" defendant's inability to pay fine.
One of the issues raised in this case was whether the district court erred when it imposed a fine of $25,000 on the defendant, despite the facts that the presentence report concluded that he was ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Casiano, No. 96-1256 (3rd Cir.) (113 F.3d 420) (May 7, 1997) (Judge Dolores K. Sloviter)
- U.S. v. Laurenzana, No. 96-3077 (7th Cir.) (113 F.3d 689) (May 5, 1997) (Judge Walter J. Cummings)
- U.S. v. Lewis, No. 96-1468 (3rd Cir.) (113 F.3d 487) (May 14, 1997) (Judge Morton I. Greenberg)
- U.S. v. Vasquez, No. 96-1163 (2nd Cir.) (113 F.3d 383) (May 19, 1997) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- U.S. v. Bradfield, No. 94-60730 (5th Cir.) (113 F.3d 515) (May 14, 1997) (Judge Jacques L. Jr. Weiner)
- Sherwood v. Mulvihill, No. 96-5236 (3rd Cir.) (113 F.3d 396) (May 15, 1997) (Judge Collins J. Seitz)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 95-3173 (D.C. Cir.) (113 F.3d 243) (May 20, 1997) (Judge Laurence H. Silberman)
- Dyer v. Calderon, No. 95-99002 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 927) (May 5, 1997) (Judge J. Clifford Wallace)
- U.S. v. Pearson, No. 95-3204 (7th Cir.) (113 F.3d 758) (May 14, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
- U.S. v. Wofford, No. 96-10008 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 977) (May 7, 1997) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Longoria, No. 96-30010 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 975) (May 7, 1997) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 96-30161 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 1026) (May 9, 1997) (Judge William W. Schwarzer)
- U.S. v. Duarte-Higareda, No. 95-50179 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 1000) (May 9, 1997) (Judge Harry Pregerson)
- U.S. v. Fields, No. 96-1168, No. 431 (2nd Cir.) (113 F.3d 313) (May 12, 1997) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- Cort v. Crabtree, No. 96-36226 (9th Cir.) (113 F.3d 1081) (May 19, 1997) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
- U.S. v. Khounsavanh, No. 96-1244 (1st Cir.) (113 F.3d 279) (May 16, 1997) (Judge Hugh H. Bownes)
- U.S. v. Tackett, No. 95-6127 (6th Cir.) (133 F.3d 603) (May 15, 1997) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Powell, No. 96-7242 (3rd Cir.) (113 F.3d 464) (May 12, 1997) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
- U.S. v. Fields, No. 96-1168, No. 431 (2nd Cir.) (113 F.3d 313) (May 12, 1997) (Judge Richard J. Cardamone)
- White v. Tamlyn, No. 96-CV-40097 (E.D.Mich.) (961 F.Supp. 1047) (March 31, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Gadola)
More from these topics:
- $3.25 Million Settlement Reached With Defendants Jailed in Missouri “Debtor’s Prison” for Unpaid Fines, Fees, Oct. 15, 2023. Settlements, Indigent Defendants - Fees and Expenses, Ability to Pay, Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP).
- Corizon Executes “Texas Two-Step,” Spinning Off Debt Into Bankrupt New Firm to Avoid Paying Creditors and Lawsuit Winners, Aug. 15, 2023. Corizon, Settlements, Ability to Pay.
- Missouri Senior Citizen Jailed Three Days After Letting Dog Off Leash, April 27, 2023. Restitution, Ability to Pay.
- Idaho Joins Missouri in Banning Incarceration for Inability To Pay Court Fines, Fees, Sept. 30, 2022. Ability to Pay, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
- California Court Tells State Prisoner His $12 Monthly Pay Is Enough to Pay Court-Ordered Fines and Fees, Aug. 18, 2022. Seizure of Prisoner Funds, Ability to Pay.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Violated Humphrey by Setting High Bail Without Considering Financial Condition of Defendant or Nonfinancial Conditions of Release, June 15, 2022. Procedural Default/Error, Bail/Pretrial Release, Ability to Pay.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Orders New Parole Hearing for Prisoner Held Since 1979, May 1, 2022. Restitution, Conditions of, Ability to Pay.
- Did Two Judges Violate Ethics in Florida Voting Rights Restoration Case?, Oct. 15, 2020. Ethical Restraints, Judicial Disqualification/Misconduct, Ability to Pay, Felon Disenfranchisement Statute.
- Florida’s “Pay-to-Vote” System Struck Down, July 1, 2020. Ability to Pay, Constitutional Challenges/Claims.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.