Skip navigation

U.S. v. Harrison, No. 96-2544WM (8th Cir.) (113 F.3d 135) (May 9, 1997) (Judge George G. Fagg)

Case held that that when a defendant challenges one of at least two interdependent sentences, the district court can re-sentence on the counts not appealed because the defendant "has effectively challenged interwoven sentencing plan.".

United States v. Cazares, 112 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1997) (Judge Schwarzer)
Lee v. …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login