Skip navigation

U.S. v. Harrison, No. 96-2544WM (8th Cir.) (113 F.3d 135) (May 9, 1997) (Judge George G. Fagg)

Case held that that when a defendant challenges one of at least two interdependent sentences, the district court can re-sentence on the counts not appealed because the defendant "has effectively challenged interwoven sentencing plan.".

United States v. Cazares, 112 F.3d 1391 (9th Cir. 1997) (Judge Schwarzer)
Lee v. United States, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login