U.S. v. Ramirez, No. 96-2237 (7th Cir.) (112 F.3d 849) (April 28, 1997) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
Case held that wiretap statute authorized judge in Wisconsin to order wiretap regardless of whether target phones were located in Wisconsin or Minnesota.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Ramirez, No. 96-2237 (7th Cir.) (112 F.3d 849) (April 28, 1997) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Bailey, No. 95-5727 (4th Cir.) (112 F.3d 758) (May 2, 1997) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
- U.S. v. Harbin, No. 96-3015 (8th Cir.) (112 F.3d 974) (May 5, 1997) (Judge Pasco M. II Bowman)
- U.S. v. Pappert, No. 95-3071 (10th Cir.) (112 F.3d 1073) (April 28, 1997) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
- U.S. v. Bailey, No. 95-5727 (4th Cir.) (112 F.3d 758) (May 2, 1997) (Judge H. Emory Jr. Widener)
- U.S. v. Shadduck, No. 95-1395 (1st Cir.) (112 F.3d 523) (April 24, 1997) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Delgado, No. 96-593-CR (S.D.Fla.) (959 F.Supp. 1523) (January 15, 1997) (Judge K. Michael Moore)
- U.S. v. Braxton, No. 96-4242 (4th Cir.) (112 F.3d 777) (May 6, 1997) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- De La Paz v. Peters, No. 93 C 7652 (N.D.Ill.) (959 F.Supp. 909) (March 27, 1997) (Judge Ruben Castillo)
- U.S. v. Berardini, No. 96-1421 (2nd Cir.) (112 F.3d 606) (April 30, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Vaknin, No. 96-1394 (1st Cir.) (112 F.3d 579) (May 6, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Larson, No. 96-1576 (2nd Cir.) (112 F.3d 600) (July 30, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Vaknin, No. 96-1394 (1st Cir.) (112 F.3d 579) (May 6, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Achiekwelu, No. 95-5765 (4th Cir.) (112 F.3d 747) (May 1, 1997) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- U.S. v. Berardini, No. 96-1421 (2nd Cir.) (112 F.3d 606) (April 30, 1997) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- U.S. v. Achiekwelu, No. 95-5765 (4th Cir.) (112 F.3d 747) (May 1, 1997) (Judge Francis D. Jr. Murnaghan)
- U.S. v. Knox, No. 96-50340 (5th Cir.) (112 F.3d 802) (May 1, 1997) (Judge Harold R. Jr. DeMoss)
- U.S. v. Vaknin, No. 96-1394 (1st Cir.) (112 F.3d 579) (May 6, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Scholl, No. CR 95-576 (D.Ariz.) (959 F.Supp. 1189) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Roslyn O. Silver)
- U.S. v. Shadduck, No. 95-1395 (1st Cir.) (112 F.3d 523) (April 24, 1997) (Judge Conrad K. Cyr)
- U.S. v. Scholl, No. CR 95-576 (D.Ariz.) (959 F.Supp. 1189) (February 27, 1997) (Judge Roslyn O. Silver)
- U.S. v. 408 Peyton Road, S.W., Atlanta, No. 95-8330 (11th Cir.) (112 F.3d 1106) (May 15, 1997) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Tsinhnahijinnie, No. 96-10082 (9th Cir.) (112 F.3d 988) (April 24, 1997) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.