Skip navigation

U.S. v. Angotti, No. 94-50216 (9th Cir.) (105 F.3d 539) (January 28, 1997) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)

This case is noted for Judge Norris' dissent in which he argued that conviction based on where a bank happens to process a loan, regardless of whether the applicant has any idea where it will be sent, makes no sense in law or in logic.

Although the concept of "venue" …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login