Skip navigation

U.S. v. Angotti, No. 94-50216 (9th Cir.) (105 F.3d 539) (January 28, 1997) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)

This case is noted for Judge Norris' dissent in which he argued that conviction based on where a bank happens to process a loan, regardless of whether the applicant has any idea where it will be sent, makes no sense in law or in logic.

Although the concept of "venue" ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login