Skip navigation

U.S. v. Campbell, No. 96-40115 (5th Cir.) (106 F.3d 64) (February 7, 1997) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

Here using what it called the "aggregate sentencing approach", the Court held that the "presumption of vindictiveness" discussed in North Carolina v. Pearce did not apply to the facts of this case and it affirmed the new sentence.

This case raises an old question - what constitutes vindictive sentencing after ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login