U.S. v. Cothran, No. 96-8191 (11th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1560) (March 11, 1997) (Judge James C. Hill)
Loaded on March 1, 1997
published in Punch and Jurists
March 31, 1997
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity.
Case held that on a resentencing based on Guideline Amendment 516 the district court is not free, under 18 USC § 3582(c)(2) to reexamine the factual determination of the number of marijuana plants attrtibuted to the defendant.
Citing a number of other decisions in accord, the Court held that the ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 96-2407 (7th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1362) (February 13, 1997) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
- U.S. v. Bongiorno, No. 96-1052 (1st Cir.) (106 F.3d 1027) (February 7, 1997) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Czubinski, No. 06-1317 (1st Cir.) (106 F.3d 1069) (February 21, 1997) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Molina, No. 96-1260(L) (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1118) (February 12, 1997) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Collado, No. 95-1512, No. 1811 (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1097) (January 13, 1997) (Judge Alvin W. Thompson)
- U.S. v. Matthews, No. 96-1419, No. 750 (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1092) (January 3, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. Sposito, No. 95-1755 (1st Cir.) (106 F.3d 1042) (February 18, 1997) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Molina, No. 96-1260(L) (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1118) (February 12, 1997) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 95-3097 (D.C. Cir.) (106 F.3d 983) (February 21, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- Hampton v. Hobbs, No. 96-3524 (6th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1281) (February 13, 1997) (Judge Boyce F. Jr. Martin)
- U.S. v. Cothran, No. 96-8191 (11th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1560) (March 11, 1997) (Judge James C. Hill)
- U.S. v. Gambino, No. 96-1125 (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1105) (February 11, 1997) (Judge Fred I. Parker)
- U.S. v. Flores-Uribe, No. 96-30156 (9th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1485) (February 18, 1997) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 95-3097 (D.C. Cir.) (106 F.3d 983) (February 21, 1997) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cleveland, No. 96-1043 (1st Cir.) (106 F.3d 1056) (February 18, 1997) (Judge Levin H. Campbell)
- U.S. v. Rowe, No. 96-40346 (5th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1226) (February 25, 1997) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. 95-7245 (3rd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1140) (February 14, 1997) (Judge Timothy K. Lewis)
- U.S. v. Marmolejo, No. 95-20983 (5th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1213) (February 21, 1997) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Flores-Uribe, No. 96-30156 (9th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1485) (February 18, 1997) (Judge Pamela Ann Rymer)
- U.S. v. Moses, No. 95-6066 (6th Cir.) (106 F.3d 1273) (February 13, 1997) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Matthews, No. 96-1419, No. 750 (2nd Cir.) (106 F.3d 1092) (January 3, 1997) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
More from these topics:
- Refuting the Government’s Argument Against Nonretroactive Changes in Law as Grounds for Compassionate Release, Oct. 1, 2024. Retroactivity, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity, Compassionate Release.
- U.S. Sentencing Commission Greenlights Retroactive Sentence Reductions, March 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity.
- Fourth Circuit Holds Ineligibility for First Step Act Safety Valve Relief Requires Proof of All Three Listed Criminal History Characteristics Satisfied, Widening Circuit Split, June 15, 2023. First Step Act, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity.
- Eleventh Circuit Announces Defendant Must Satisfy All Three Subsections of § 3553(f)(1) to Be Ineligible for Safety Valve, May 15, 2023. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, First Step Act, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity.
- SCOTUS Holds Ramos’ Unanimous Jury Requirement Is New Procedural Rule and Announces No New Procedural Rule Applies Retroactively on Federal Collateral Review, Oct. 15, 2021. Procedural Default/Error, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.