Skip navigation

U.S. v. Porotsky, No. 96-1479, No. 1010 (2nd Cir.) (105 F.3d 69) (January 15, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court vacated a sentence because travel restrictions imposed were not reasonably related to the defendant's rehabilitation or the public interest - the twin goals of probation.

In a tersely worded decision, the Second Circuit took Judge Wexler to task for refusing to adhere to its earlier ruling in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login