Skip navigation

U.S. v. Amer, No. 96-1181 (2nd Cir.) (110 F.3d 873) (March 26, 1997) (Judge Jon O. Newman)

Court held that while district courts have broad discretion to tailor conditions of supervised release to goals and purposes of sentencing, the Guidelines do not provide sentencing courts with untrammeled discretion in that regard.

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login