Skip navigation

U.S. v. Brooks, No. 95-5728 (4th Cir.) (111 F.3d 365) (April 16, 1997) (Judge Paul V. Niemeyer)

In this case of first impression, the Court acknowledged that its decision was at variance with what it called dictum in U.S. v. Nadi, 996 F.2d 548 (2nd Cir. 1993) where that court stated that for purposes of the jurisdictional requirements of § 1031(a) "the value of the contract is ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login