Skip navigation

U.S. v. Lamplugh, No. 3:Misc.-94-88-01 (M.D.Pa.) (956 F.Supp. 1204) (March 4, 1997) (Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie)

This case is noted because it is one of the few reported cases in which a defendant actually wins a motion under Rule 41(e) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. for the return of property seized at the time of his arrest, which is neither evidence of a charged offense nor the fruit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login