Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rector, No. 96-1952 (7th Cir.) (111 F.3d 503) (April 11, 1997) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)

The Court stated: ""[T]he adjustment [for acceptance of responsibility] is rarely available to those who assert entrapment, a defense that by its nature tends to preclude the acceptance of responsibility.
Essentially, the problem is that asserting entrapment is a denial rather than an acceptance of responsibility. A defendant asserting such ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login