Skip navigation

U.S. v. Russell, No. 96-3039 (10th Cir.) (109 F.3d 1503) (February 27, 1997) (Justice White)

The Court also conlcuded that "Although Rule 16 does not control this case, it provides a helpful point of reference for our analysis by describing the district court's authority to remedy discovery infractions in analogous circumstances. Rule 16(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure invests the district court with ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login