Skip navigation

Crocker v. U.S., No. 97-5059 (Fed. Cir.) (125 F.3d 1475) (September 22, 1997) (Per Curiam)

Here the Court held that a claim seeking "the recovery of identified property and monies [is] an action that is equitable in nature and sharply distinguishable from an action at law for damages." (Id., at 1477).

Although the Court held it did not have jurisdiction under the Tucker Act to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login